My personal knowledge about the fresh new Oppenheimer case appear not merely out of my lead engagement on it, plus because of my character for a few decades as the advice for the AEC’s Division of Protection and you will my intimate private relationship then and because then with a high AEC coverage officials
Kenneth D. Nichols, the AEC’s General Director, necessary on Commission the Gray Board’s results and recommendation out-of May 27, 1954, getting acknowledged, in addition to Fee to your Summer twenty-eight, 1954, awarded its four-to-that choice (Henry D. The fresh new Oppenheimer circumstances made great personal debate at that time, as well as over the years might have been the main topic of numerous courses and blogs. Most commentators has interpreted happening because an excellent vendetta on the element of Lewis L. Strauss, then-chairman of your own AEC, or from army officials (generally the Air Force) facing Oppenheimer on the basis of personality and you may/otherwise coverage conflicts. The most recent evaluation, of the Jack Holl, one of several official historians of your nuclear opportunity system is displayed from the Western Historical Association’s standard conference inside the December 1975.
It assessment may be offered significant credence due to the fresh new professional standing and you will integrity of your own authoritative historians and since the new membership is dependent on complete, uninhibited access to AEC data. Basically, the fresh new Holl account disputes the scene that circumstances originated from a beneficial Strauss vendetta against Oppenheimer.
